Effective replacement - designed to match the fit and function of the stock brake dust shield on specific vehicle applications
Longer service life - corrosion-resistant steel construction protects brakes from elements and debris
Ideal fix - directly replaces highly deterioration-prone original part
Precision-engineered - has undergone dimensional verification and salt spray testing to ensure quality
Product Details
OE Solutions™ Brake Dust Shield by Dorman®. Package Quantity: 1. Protect the braking system from debris and corrosive weather conditions with this rust-resistant replacement brake dust shield. Dimensional verification and salt spray testing ensures proper fit and extended service life.
Only authorized customers can leave a review on our website. We would love to know what you like or dislike about the product. Share your opinion on product quality, appearance, installation, and other characteristics.
/5
1-5 of 5 Reviews
4 of 5
Dodge Ram Rear Backing Plates
Product looks like it will rust quickly in area that salt is used on roads for de icing.
Posted by Gregory (North East, PA) / March 07, 20172004 Chevy Silverado
4 of 5
Dorman-Rear Dust Shield for Ford Explorer
Quality and craftsmanship is excellent. It fits and works like the factory installed product. Downside like the factory parts they don't cut out the holes for the emergency brake adjuster and give a plug for the hole, so if you need to remove your rotor you can't back the adjuster off for easy removal. Installation is a little difficult because they don't make a two piece system for this vehicle. So you either have to press the spindle out and replace the bearings (this process isn't cheap or easy) or cut it in half were the heat slots are and weld it back together (may not have to weld it back together, but helps with rigidness). They give you four screws self tapping screws for each side. The factory only uses 3, but has four holes, so you have to you have to tap the fourth hole with the new screw. On other vehicles they sell them in singles instead of pairs. Unfortunately only needed one.